Openaccess Gennaio 2012

openaccess@liste.wikimedia.it

4 partecipanti
9 conversazioni

Wikipedia Vs Academic Papers
by Andrea Zanni 31 Gen '12

31 Gen '12

I've been sent this very interesting article about Wikipedia and academic papers: http://intermolecular.wordpress.com/2012/01/30/wikipedia-vs-academic-papers… Worth reading. Aubrey

1 0

Results of EU public consultation on scientific information in the digital age
by Andrea Zanni 30 Gen '12

30 Gen '12

Dear all, few months ago th EU proposed a public consultation on scientific information in the digital age. Many Wikimedia chapters did reply to this survey, and results are available: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/survey… Let me quote just the first results: *Access to digital scientific information: scientific publications* Respondents were asked if there is no access problem to scientific publications in Europe: 84 % disagreed or disagreed strongly with the statement. The high prices of journals/subscriptions (89 %) and limited library budgets (85 %) were signalled as the most important barriers to accessing scientific publications. More than 1 000 respondents (90 %) supported the idea that publications resulting from publicly funded research should, as a matter of principle, be in open access (OA) mode. An even higher number of respondents (91 %) agreed or agreed strongly that OA increased access to and dissemination of scientific publications. Self-archiving (‘green OA’) or a combination of self-archiving and OA publishing (‘gold OA’) were identified as the preferred ways that public research policy should facilitate in order to increase the number and share of scientific publications available in OA. Respondents were asked, in the case of self-archiving (‘green OA’), what the desirable embargo period is (period of time during which publication is not yet open access): a six-month period was favoured by 56 % of respondents (although 25 % disagree with this option). *Access to digital scientific information: research data* As for the question of access to research data, the vast majority of respondents (87 %) disagreed or disagreed strongly with the statement that there is no access problem for research data in Europe. The barriers to access research data considered very important or important by respondents were: lack of funding to develop and maintain the necessary infrastructures (80 %); the insufficient credit given to researchers for making research data available (80 %); and insufficient national/regional strategies/policies (79 %). There was strong support (90 % of responses) for research data that is publicly available and results from public funding to be, as a matter of principle, available for reuse and free of charge on the Internet. Lower support (72 % of responses) was given for data resulting from partly publicly and partly privately funded research. *Preservation of digital scientific information *Responding to the question asking whether preservation of scientific information is at present sufficiently addressed, 64 % of the respondents disagreed or disagreed strongly. The main barriers signalled in this area were: uncertainty as to who is responsible for preserving scientific information (80 %); the quality and interoperability of repositories (78 %); and the lack of a harmonised approach to legal deposit (69 %). Regards, Aubrey

1 0

German National Bibliography as LOD under CC0
by Andrea Zanni 30 Gen '12

30 Gen '12

Inoltro da altra lista, saluti Aubrey ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Francesca Di Donato <francesca.didonato(a)sp.unipi.it> Date: 2012/1/26 Subject: [Oa-italia] German National Bibliography as LOD under CC0 To: oa-italia(a)openarchives.it Una buona notizia (e un'esperienza da imitare). Saluti, francesca Inizio messaggio inoltrato: *Da: *Adrian Pohl <adrian.pohl(a)okfn.org> *Data: *26 gennaio 2012 12.43.05 GMT+01.00 *A: *List for Working Group on Open Bibliographic Data < open-bibliography(a)lists.okfn.org> *Oggetto: **[open-bibliography] German National Bibliography as LOD under CC0* *Rispondi a: *List for Working Group on Open Bibliographic Data < open-bibliography(a)lists.okfn.org> Hello, good news from Germany. The German National Library 1) changed its licensing regime for Linked Data to CC0 which makes the data open according to the open definition[1], 2) has begun to publish the German national bibliography as Linked Open Data. For more information see the blog post at < http://openbiblio.net/2012/01/26/german-national-library-goes-lod-publishes… >. All the best Adrian _______________________________________________ open-bibliography mailing list open-bibliography(a)lists.okfn.org http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography Francesca Di Donato Dipartimento di Scienze politiche e sociali Università di Pisa Via Serafini, 3 - 56126 Pisa (PI) http://www.sp.unipi.it/hp/didonato/ _______________________________________________ OA-Italia mailing list OA-Italia(a)openarchives.it http://openarchives.it/mailman/listinfo/oa-italia PLEIADI: http://www.openarchives.it/pleiadi/

1 0

Contenuti e contenitori open access
by Andrea Zanni 24 Gen '12

24 Gen '12

Dal nuovo post di Maria Chiara Pievatolo, (e come al solito, con una miniera di link tutti interessanti) http://bfp.sp.unipi.it/btfp/?p=1033 vi faccio vedere questa cosa, che ci interessa per due motivi: contenuto e contenitore. http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/mcpress/plannedobsolescence/how-to-… Non avevo mai visto questo software e sembra molto interessante. Chissà se anche MediaWiki potrà permettere un giorno una discussione così "granulare". Aubrey

1 0

PDF leggero
by Andrea Zanni 22 Gen '12

22 Gen '12

4 paginette utili. http://www.rluk.ac.uk/content/rluksconul-briefing-impact-open-access Ho mandato anche alla neonata lista open access: l'ha ricevuta qualcuno? qualcuno è iscritto? sarebbero da contattare tutti gli intressati (stefano costa, gli archeologi di marina, ecc.) Aubrey

2 1

Primo messaggio.
by Bob Draco 12 Gen '12

12 Gen '12

Se avete domande o commenti sono a vostra disposizione. Sono Roberto, ilCorda per gli amici. Ciao R. -- http://singloids.com/ http://drachinobello.wordpress.com/ http://wikirumors.wordpress.com

3 3

[MOD] Seconda prova tecnica.
by Bob Draco 07 Gen '12

07 Gen '12

Ciao R. -- http://singloids.com/ http://drachinobello.wordpress.com/ http://wikirumors.wordpress.com

1 0

[MOD] Hello world
by Bob Draco 07 Gen '12

07 Gen '12

Ping. Ciao R. -- http://singloids.com/ http://drachinobello.wordpress.com/ http://wikirumors.wordpress.com

1 0

Le mailing list sono attive? posso iscrivermi?
by Marina Milella 04 Gen '12

04 Gen '12

Come da oggetto :-) Marina Milella http://www.decarch.it

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

Openaccess Gennaio 2012