FYI, WMI richiederà questo per qualunque collaborazione relativa a digitalizzazioni. Infatti abbiamo collaborato (pochino) alla bozza del documento in questione fin dall'inizio (parecchi mesi fa) e abbiamo già sottoscritto il testo in una versione quasi-definitiva come parte di http://wiki.wikimedia.it/wiki/Consultazione_europea_sul_diritto_d%27autore#4... (oltre che i principi del manifesto e dello statuto del pubblico dominio).

Nemo

-------- Messaggio originale -------- Oggetto: COMMUNIA policy paper on digitization agreements Data: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 19:16:45 +0000 Mittente: <Primavera De Filippi>

COMMUNIA policy paper on digitization agreements

The aim of this policy paper http://www.communia-association.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/COMMUNIA-digitization.pdf is to make policy recommendations for cultural institutions to preserve the Public Domain when using digitization services provided by private entities. This becomes particularly relevant in the context of the 2013 Public Sector Information (PSI) Directive which adds Museums, Libraries and Archives in the list of Public Sector Bodies (PSBs) that have to make their information reusable.

The Public Domain ensures the free dissemination of knowledge and provides everyone with the potential to access and create new works based on previous works. Thus, all Public Domain works should be free for everyone to use and reuse. Yet, as many cultural heritage institutions are entering into contractual agreements with third parties for the digitization of Public Domain works, there are serious concerns regarding the conditions of access, use and reuse of the resulting digitized copies.

Ideally, digital copies of Public Domain materials would be made immediately and freely available to the public. However, in practice, many of these public-private partnerships impose contractual restrictions that limit access and re-use of Public Domain materials. These restrictions have the same effect as introducing a new proprietary right over the digitized copies of Public Domain material, thereby substantially limiting the use and reuse of content that belongs to the common cultural heritage by subjecting it to a requirement of prior authorisation.

This risk is further increased with the introduction of the PSI 2013 regime, which allows the conclusion of exclusive agreements between private entities and PSBs under restrictive terms and with a potential perpetual validity.

A work in the Public Domain should have the same legal properties, regardless of the format or medium it is in. Hence, /*works that are in the Public Domain in analog form [should] continue to be in the Public Domain once they have been digitised*/ (see the Europeana Public Domain Charter http://pro.europeana.eu/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=d542819d-d169-4240-9247-f96749113eaa&groupId=10602, Principle #2, and Communia Public Domain Manifesto http://www.publicdomainmanifesto.org/manifesto, Recommendation #5). Contractual agreements as regards the digitization of Public Domain works should acknowledge and respect the fundamental properties of these works, and not attempt to subvert Public Domain principles through contract and other legal mechanisms.

To ensure the broadest availability and long-term accessibility of Public Domain works, their digital copies should be made available to the public in a format and medium allowing for easy identification, retrieval and modification, while ensuring the maximum interoperability of these works. The use of metadata and open formats constitutes an important requirement to ensure that the value of the Public Domain is properly understood and that the works belonging to the Public Domain will always remain freely (re)usable.

In view of this, we make the following recommendations:

*No copyright protection*

*

*over the digitized version:*

All parties to the partnership should expressly state that they do not claim copyright nor sui generis rights in the digitized copies of the Public Domain material.

* The digitized version should be marked as in the Public Domain using a tool such as the Creative Commons Public Domain Mark http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/, or, alternatively, if digitization itself gave rise to new related rights, these should be waived by applying a Public Domain dedication tool such as CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. * Up-to-date metadata and the database (if protected by sui generis rights) should be made available and dedicated to the Public Domain using tools such as the CC0 Public Domain Dedication http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ following the model of Europeana, the Digital Public Library of America, Harvard Library and the British Library. * *for newly published works:*

In countries where copyright law grants an additional term of protection to the publishers of Public Domain works that have never been published before, the rights holder should dedicate the work to the Public Domain by means of tools such as the CC0 Public Domain Dedication.

*No contractual restrictions*

*

Access and reuse to Public Domain works should be unrestricted, both on premises and on the Internet for any type of use and reuse, including for commercial purposes.

*

No exclusive agreements should be made between the cultural institution and the commercial vendor that would preclude another vendor or institution from digitizing or distributing the same Public Domain material.

*Openness & Transparency*

*

The institution should use standardized, open technological formats and request the contractor to transfer digitized material and metadata in standardized open technological formats.

*

Bidders’ offers should be made publicly available. Transparency should prevail in the decision-making process affecting public access to our common cultural heritage collections.

The Communia International Association calls for cultural institutions, such as libraries, archives and museums to observe the following guidelines, and to promote them in their negotiations with contractors, donors and legal owners of materials.