scusandomi per il crossposting, mi domando perché non usare Wikidata per questo dizionario.
Susanna .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. *Susanna Giaccai* Firenze
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net Date: 2015-08-06 4:47 GMT+02:00 Subject: Re: [libraries] Help build out a GLAM Glossary To: Wikimedia & Libraries libraries@lists.wikimedia.org, " cultural-partners@wikimedia.ch" cultural-partners@wikimedia.ch, "Wikimedia & GLAM collaboration [Public]" glam@lists.wikimedia.org, North American Cultural Partnerships glam-us@lists.wikimedia.org, "GLAM-Wiki U.S. Consortium advisory board" glam-us-consortium@lists.wikimedia.org, Mailing list for the Wikipedia Library project < wikipedia-library@lists.wikimedia.org>
You might want to look at the short glossary we created for the W3C Library Linked Data work:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Library_terminology_informally_explained
I think that a slightly more extensive description of terms is quite helpful. Just saying that MARC is machine-readable cataloging is probably not enough for most folks. ;-)
kc
On 8/5/15 6:05 PM, Jake Orlowitz wrote:
Hello all!
The Wikipedia Library team has been building a "GLAM Glossary" to help Wikipedians who want to work with GLAMs to acclimatize to the language, terminology, and jargon in the field.
Knowing the right words to use, and what they mean, will lead to more effective outreach and partnerships.
We would love for more knowledgeable folks to add or suggest terms.
*Jump in! * https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Glossary
Cheers, Jake Orlowitz and The Wikipedia Library team
Libraries mailing list Libraries@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries